Content and Language Objectives
Content and language objectives are paired, explicit statements planned for a lesson and made visible to students: a content objective names what students will learn and do with grade-level concepts (the "what"), and a language objective names the academic language students will use to access and demonstrate that learning (the "how" of language). A strong language objective targets a specific function (describe, compare, justify, sequence), the vocabulary and discourse the task requires, and a language domain (listening, speaking, reading, or writing). This pairing is a core feature of the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP Model) and aligns with the Texas English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS), which call for second language acquisition to be integrated across all content areas rather than taught in isolation. The objective makes visible the language demand that is often hidden inside content tasks, so emergent bilingual students receive explicit, planned support for both the concept and the language.
How it’s typically applied
- 1Start from the grade-level TEKS and write the content objective first: a clear, observable statement of what students will know or be able to do (e.g., 'Students will explain how erosion changes landforms').
- 2Analyze the lesson for its language demands. Ask: What will students have to listen to, say, read, or write to reach the content goal? Identify the key academic vocabulary, the language function (compare, sequence, justify, define), and any sentence structures the task requires.
- 3Write a paired language objective that names a function, a target form or vocabulary, and a domain (e.g., 'Students will orally compare two landforms using comparative language: -er than, more than, while').
- 4Align the language objective to the relevant ELPS cross-curricular second language acquisition student expectation and to students' proficiency levels, so the same content goal carries differentiated language supports.
- 5Post both objectives in student-friendly language, state them aloud at the start of the lesson, and connect them to the day's tasks so students know what concept and what language they are working on.
- 6Build in scaffolds that let students meet the language objective: sentence stems, word banks, visuals, modeled examples, and structured talk with partners.
- 7Revisit both objectives at the close of the lesson and have students self-assess (e.g., a quick 'I can...' check) so the objectives function as formative assessment, not just an opening ritual.
Why it works for emergent bilingual students
Emergent bilingual students arrive with rich conceptual knowledge and full linguistic repertoires in their home language(s) that are assets for learning grade-level content. A language objective makes the academic language demand explicit and plannable, so teachers can deliberately bridge what students already know and can express into new academic English. This reflects Cummins' distinction between everyday conversational language and the cognitive academic language proficiency that school tasks require, and his common underlying proficiency principle, which holds that concepts and skills developed in one language transfer across a learner's languages. Naming the language function and vocabulary up front turns an implicit, often invisible demand into a clear target with scaffolds, and pairing it with structured talk and writing gives students meaningful opportunities to use academic English in context, a condition second language acquisition research links to language growth. The result is access to challenging, grade-level content while academic language develops alongside it, never a watered-down curriculum.
Adapting it across proficiency levels
Pre-Production
At Pre-Production (the silent period of early receptive development), keep the content objective fully grade-level but make the language objective receptive and highly supported. Students show understanding nonverbally by pointing, matching, sorting, drawing, or selecting from pictures, and any spoken or written language is optional rather than required (e.g., 'I can point to the landform that matches the word'). Honor the home language and let students first show or explain a concept in their stronger language. A correct nonverbal response meets the day's language objective at this level.
Beginning
At Beginning, students move from comprehension to early production with heavy support. The language objective asks for single words, set phrases, and short sentence stems tied to a word bank with visuals (e.g., 'I can label the landform: ___' or 'This is a ___'). Provide repeated models and let students rehearse with a partner before producing. Allow students to map a concept they can already express in their home language onto the English target. A one-word or memorized-phrase response with support meets the objective.
Intermediate
At Intermediate, the language objective asks students to produce short connected language at the sentence and short-paragraph level. Provide sentence stems and a small set of target academic words, and ask students to complete the function with support (e.g., 'I can compare two landforms in 2-3 sentences using: ___ is ___er than ___ because ___'). Students participate in structured partner talk and write with a frame, gradually relying less on the word bank as the function becomes familiar.
High Intermediate / Advanced
At High Intermediate and Advanced, the language objective targets extended, more precise, and discipline-specific academic discourse with reduced scaffolding. Students explain, justify, and synthesize across a paragraph or more, choosing appropriate academic vocabulary and connectors on their own (e.g., 'I can write a paragraph that justifies which force most changed the landform, using cause-and-effect language and at least three content terms'). Stems become optional models, and students take on the kind of complex, abstract academic language Zwiers describes for content classrooms.
In the classroom
In a fifth-grade science lesson on the water cycle, the teacher posts a content objective ('I can explain how water moves through the water cycle, including evaporation, condensation, and precipitation') beside a language objective ('I can orally describe each stage of the water cycle using the sequence words first, next, then, finally and the verbs evaporates, condenses, falls'). She states both aloud, models one stage using a labeled diagram and a sentence stem ('First, the water ___ because ___'), then has partners take turns describing the cycle while pointing to the diagram. Pre-Production students point to and sequence picture cards as the cycle is described; Beginning students label the stages and produce single target verbs with the word bank; Intermediate students speak in 2-3 sentence chains using the stems; Advanced students explain the full cycle in a connected paragraph without the stems. At the end, students rate themselves on an 'I can describe the water cycle' check, giving the teacher a quick read on both the science concept and the language target.
Research basis
Pairing explicit content objectives with explicit language objectives in every lesson is a defining feature of the SIOP Model for making grade-level content comprehensible to English learners.
Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J. (2017). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (5th ed.). Pearson.
Language objectives outline the academic language students need to accomplish lesson goals; English learners best acquire English when language forms are explicitly taught and when they have many meaningful opportunities to use the language, and objectives should be stated at the start of a lesson and reviewed at the end.
Himmel, J. (2012). Language objectives: The key to effective content area instruction for English learners. Colorín Colorado. https://www.colorincolorado.org/article/language-objectives-key-effective-content-area-instruction-english-learners [link]
Academic content tasks require cognitive academic language proficiency that differs from everyday conversational language, and concepts and skills transfer across a bilingual learner's languages through a common underlying proficiency, so home-language knowledge is an asset for English academic learning.
Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. V. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 71-83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_36 [link]
The cognitive/academic language proficiency distinction was introduced to draw educators' attention to the time and support second language learners need to reach the academic register required by school tasks.
Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 121-129.
Content-area classrooms must deliberately build students' ability to understand and produce the abstract concepts, higher-order thinking, and complex discourse of a discipline, which calls for explicit, planned academic-language instruction embedded in content teaching.
Zwiers, J. (2014). Building academic language: Meeting Common Core standards across disciplines, grades 5-12 (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
The Texas English Language Proficiency Standards require that second language acquisition be integrated across all content areas for emergent bilingual students, and the refreshed ELPS adopted in 2024 and implemented beginning in 2026-2027 expand the framework to five proficiency levels (pre-production, beginning, intermediate, high intermediate, and advanced) with detailed proficiency level descriptors.
English Language Proficiency Standards, Grades 4-12, 19 Tex. Admin. Code § 120.21 (2024). [link]
Sources reviewed by an independent second-language-acquisition specialist and an adversarial citation audit.
Ask Verónica about Content and Language Objectives
Verónica is our AI tutor, and she knows this strategy. Tell her about your classroom, your mix of proficiency levels, or a specific TEKS you are planning to teach, and she will help you put Content and Language Objectives to work.
These strategies are part of the free ELPS Online Helper. Learn the 2026 ELPS and earn 1 hour of CPE credit.
Explore the free course