Oral LanguageSpeakingListening

Modeled Talk

Modeled Talk is an oral-language strategy in which the teacher demonstrates a task, direction, or concept while explaining it aloud in clear, structured language, pairing each key word with a gesture, visual, prop, or action so that meaning is carried by more than the words alone. The teacher slows the pace, emphasizes high-utility vocabulary, and often thinks aloud to make invisible reasoning visible. Because comprehension is supported by the demonstration, students can follow along and understand before they are asked to produce language themselves. It is cataloged as a core strategy in Herrell and Jordan's collection and aligns closely with the comprehensible-input and modeling features of the SIOP Model.

How it’s typically applied

  1. 1Identify the lesson objective and the specific task, routine, or concept you will model, then list the key vocabulary and academic language students need in order to follow it.
  2. 2Gather concrete supports in advance: realia or props, a planned gesture or action for each step, and a simple visual of the directions (a numbered list, picture cues, or a labeled diagram) so the spoken explanation is reinforced through multiple channels.
  3. 3Rehearse the modeled talk so your gestures, facial expressions, and body language clearly match what you are saying, and plan a slowed, clearly enunciated delivery that emphasizes the target words.
  4. 4Perform the demonstration in front of students, narrating each step aloud as you do it (for example, holding up the object as you name it and showing the action as you describe it), and think aloud to expose the reasoning, not just the steps.
  5. 5Post or display the visual of directions where students can refer back to it throughout the activity, so the support remains available after the live demonstration ends.
  6. 6Check comprehension first through low-language responses (pointing, gesturing, matching, thumbs up or down), then invite students to restate, retell, or re-enact the steps at a level matched to their proficiency.
  7. 7Release responsibility gradually: model it, do it together, let students try with a partner, then have them perform or explain it independently, keeping the visuals available as scaffolds.

Why it works for emergent bilingual students

Modeled Talk supports emergent bilingual students by making spoken language comprehensible while keeping the content at grade level. By attaching meaning to gestures, visuals, demonstrations, and a clear think-aloud, the teacher delivers input students can understand even when individual words are still new, which is precisely the kind of comprehensible input Krashen (1982) identified as central to acquisition. Because the demonstration carries much of the meaning, the strategy also helps lower the affective filter, so anxiety is less likely to block learning (Krashen, 1982), and students are not pushed to produce language before they are ready, honoring the comprehension-before-production sequence documented in total physical response research (Asher, 1969). The strategy treats students' developing English and their full linguistic and cultural repertoire as resources: meaning made visible through context invites students to map existing concepts and home-language knowledge onto new English, drawing on the context-embedded support Cummins (2008) describes as helpful while academic language develops. This asset-based stance reflects the emergent-bilingual framing that positions students' bilingualism as a resource to build on rather than a gap to remediate (García et al., 2008).

Adapting it across proficiency levels

Pre-Production

Lean almost entirely on the demonstration, gestures, realia, and visuals while keeping spoken language short and predictable; pause often and let students respond nonverbally (point, mime, match the picture, thumbs up or down, act out the step). Welcome responses or clarification in the home language, honor a silent period, and treat comprehension shown through action as full participation.

Beginning

Continue the rich gesture-and-visual support but begin pairing the demonstration with simple, repeated sentence frames and key labels (for example, First I..., Next I...). Invite one- or two-word answers, choices between two options, and chorally repeated key terms; have students re-enact the modeled steps while naming the objects or actions.

Intermediate

Keep visuals available as references but gradually shift more of the meaning to your structured speech; model with academic sentence stems and ask students to restate or retell the steps in short phrases or sentences. Have them explain the process to a partner using the posted directions, and ask for reasoning (why a step comes next) to expand their output while the scaffolds remain within reach.

High Intermediate / Advanced

Use Modeled Talk to demonstrate more complex academic discourse, nuanced reasoning, and discipline-specific language, then gradually fade the visual scaffolds. At High Intermediate, students restate and apply the model independently with occasional support; at Advanced, they extend it, paraphrase the think-aloud in their own academic English, teach the procedure to peers, and transfer the modeled language to new tasks at grade-level expectations.

In the classroom

In a fourth-grade science lesson on the water cycle, the teacher holds up a clear cup of water and a plate and says slowly, "First, I pour the water into the cup," demonstrating as she speaks and pointing to a posted, numbered picture of each step. As she covers the cup and sets it in the sun, she gestures upward and says, "The water heats up and rises. This is evaporation," tapping a labeled arrow on the diagram. She thinks aloud: "I wonder where the water will go next. I see drops forming on the plate, so it must be turning back into liquid. That is condensation." Pre-Production students point to the matching picture when she names each stage; Beginning students chorally repeat "evaporation" and "condensation" while miming the rising and falling motions; Intermediate students retell the cycle to a partner using the sentence stem "First the water..., then it..."; and Advanced students explain, in their own academic English, why the cycle repeats and apply the terms to a new example involving rain.

Research basis

  • Modeled Talk is a verbal explanation paired with physical demonstration, using gestures, visuals, and realia so meaning is comprehensible, and it is cataloged as a core strategy for teaching English language learners.

    Herrell, A. L., & Jordan, M. L. (2020). 50 strategies for teaching English language learners (6th ed.). Pearson. [link]

  • Language is acquired through comprehensible input slightly beyond the learner's current level (i+1), and a low affective filter (reduced anxiety) allows that input to reach the language-acquisition system; making input comprehensible is the central instructional task.

    Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. [link]

  • Effective sheltered instruction makes content comprehensible by modeling tasks and pairing speech with gestures, demonstrations, visuals, and clear, structured teacher talk so English learners access grade-level content while developing academic English.

    Echevarría, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. J. (2017). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (5th ed.). Pearson.

  • Learners can comprehend language conveyed through actions and demonstration before they are able to produce it, supporting a comprehension-before-production sequence and the use of physical movement to make meaning clear.

    Asher, J. J. (1969). The total physical response approach to second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 53(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1969.tb04552.x [link]

  • Context-embedded communication, in which meaning is supported by situational and nonverbal cues such as gestures, objects, and visuals, makes language more comprehensible and supports emergent bilinguals as they develop cognitive academic language proficiency.

    Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 71-83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_36 [link]

  • Framing students as emergent bilinguals positions their home language and bilingualism as assets and resources to build on rather than deficits to remediate, an equity stance for instructional decision-making.

    García, O., Kleifgen, J. A., & Falchi, L. (2008). From English language learners to emergent bilinguals (Equity Matters: Research Review No. 1). Campaign for Educational Equity, Teachers College, Columbia University. [link]

  • The new Texas English Language Proficiency Standards, adopted by the State Board of Education in 2024 and scheduled to take effect for the 2026-2027 school year, organize English language development into five proficiency levels (Pre-Production, Beginning, Intermediate, High Intermediate, and Advanced) across the listening, speaking, reading, and writing domains.

    Texas Education Agency. (2024). English language proficiency standards, 19 Tex. Admin. Code ch. 120, subch. B. https://www.txel.org/elps [link]

Sources reviewed by an independent second-language-acquisition specialist and an adversarial citation audit.

Ask Verónica about Modeled Talk

Verónica is our AI tutor, and she knows this strategy. Tell her about your classroom, your mix of proficiency levels, or a specific TEKS you are planning to teach, and she will help you put Modeled Talk to work.

How do I use Modeled Talk with 30 students?Adapt this for Beginning-level studentsHelp me align this to a TEKS objective
Loading Verónica…

These strategies are part of the free ELPS Online Helper. Learn the 2026 ELPS and earn 1 hour of CPE credit.

Explore the free course