RTI for Emergent Bilingual Students
Response to Intervention (RTI), the academic strand of a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS), is a prevention and instructional framework that delivers increasingly intensive, evidence-based reading and writing supports across tiers while monitoring how students respond. Adapted for emergent bilingual (EB) students, the framework is calibrated to each learner's English language proficiency and to the linguistic and cultural resources the student already brings, so the question "Is this student responding?" is always asked in the context of typical second-language development. Its central purpose for EBs is twofold: to accelerate literacy growth through well-designed, culturally and linguistically responsive instruction, and to help educators distinguish a language difference (expected during second-language acquisition) from a learning disability, reducing both over- and under-identification for special education. Effective implementation treats bilingualism as an asset and relies on collaboration among bilingual/ESL, general education, and special education staff rather than on any single test score.
How it’s typically applied
- 1Strengthen Tier 1 first: confirm that core reading and writing instruction is high-quality, scientifically based, and explicitly linguistically and culturally responsive (ELPS-aligned, sheltered, with comprehensible input and content-and-language objectives) so that struggle is never the result of inadequate or English-only instruction.
- 2Gather a full learner profile before flagging anyone: years and quality of prior schooling, home-language literacy, English proficiency level (TELPAS/ELPS), program model, and the cultural and linguistic strengths the student already uses to make meaning.
- 3Establish a true-peer comparison group: monitor each student's progress against other EBs with similar English proficiency and schooling history, not against monolingual English-speaking norms, so typical second-language development is not misread as a deficit.
- 4Provide Tier 2 small-group intervention (e.g., 30 to 50 minutes, 3 to 5 times weekly) that targets the specific reading or writing skill while embedding language scaffolds such as visuals, sentence frames, vocabulary pre-teaching, and home-language bridges where available.
- 5Progress-monitor frequently with measures appropriate for EBs, and check whether difficulties appear only in English or also in the home language; difficulties limited to the English-only context point toward language acquisition rather than disability.
- 6Convene a collaborative team (bilingual/ESL teacher, classroom teacher, special educator, and where relevant a bilingual speech-language pathologist) to interpret the data, intensify to individualized Tier 3 support if needed, and rule out instructional and linguistic explanations before any special-education referral.
- 7Keep clear, dated documentation of the instruction, language supports, and the student's response, so that a referral decision rests on convergent evidence across people and settings, not a single cut score.
Why it works for emergent bilingual students
When RTI is calibrated to English language proficiency, it protects EB students from a long-standing equity problem: the overlap between the normal features of second-language acquisition (a silent period, simplified syntax, a slower English reading rate, spelling influenced by the home language) and the surface markers of a reading disability. Because academic skills and concepts developed in one language can transfer to the other through a common underlying proficiency (Cummins, 1981), an EB who reads or reasons well in the home language is showing strong, transferable literacy ability, not a deficit, which is why monitoring both languages is essential. The framework also insists that core instruction be adequate before struggle is interpreted, so it honors the SLA principle that learners need comprehensible, scaffolded input and time (commonly cited as 4 to 7 years to develop academic language) to show what they know. Used this way, RTI is asset-based: it asks teachers to leverage students' bilingualism, prior knowledge, and cultural experience as the foundation for accelerated growth, and it reserves disability identification for cases where convergent, cross-linguistic evidence supports it.
Adapting it across proficiency levels
Pre-Production
At Pre-Production (the receptive 'silent period' newly named in the 2026-2027 Texas ELPS), EB students may not yet produce English, and the framework treats nonverbal responses as valid evidence of comprehension. Tier 1 and any Tier 2 support lean heavily on visuals, realia, gestures, total physical response (TPR), home-language print and oral support, and yes/no or point-to tasks. Progress is monitored through listening, matching, and pointing rather than English output, and limited talk is never by itself read as a disability marker.
Beginning
At Beginning, students produce words, short phrases, and memorized chunks. Tiered supports use sentence starters, word banks, labeled visuals, bilingual glossaries, and heavily scaffolded reading and writing of high-frequency vocabulary. Progress monitoring credits emerging output and home-language responses; the team compares the student to true peers (same proficiency and schooling) and checks whether any reading difficulty also appears in the home language before intensifying.
Intermediate
At Intermediate, students handle simple connected text and produce expanded sentences with predictable errors. Tier 2 intervention targets specific skills (decoding, fluency, comprehension strategies, paragraph writing) with moderate scaffolds such as graphic organizers, sentence frames, and paired reading. Progress is tracked with EB-appropriate measures, and the team distinguishes developmental error patterns and first-language transfer features from disability indicators.
High Intermediate / Advanced
At High Intermediate and Advanced (the top two of the five 2026-2027 Texas ELPS levels), students read and write grade-level academic text with light, fading scaffolds. Interventions, if any, focus on academic vocabulary, complex syntax, genre-specific writing, and comprehension of dense content rather than basic skills. Because these students have substantial English, the team is especially careful to use cross-linguistic data and a true-peer lens so that residual accent, register, or transfer features are not mistaken for a learning disability, while also ensuring that EBs who do have disabilities are not overlooked.
In the classroom
A second-grade teacher notices that Mateo, an Intermediate-level EB, reads English text below grade level. Before flagging him, the team confirms that Tier 1 includes ELPS-aligned sheltered instruction and reviews his profile: he reads fluently in Spanish and has solid prior schooling. They place him in a Tier 2 small group (40 minutes, four days a week) focused on English decoding and comprehension, using cognate charts, sentence frames, and paired reading, and they compare his progress to other Intermediate EBs. Biweekly monitoring in both languages shows steady English growth and strong Spanish reading, so the team interprets his early English reading rate as expected second-language development, continues the targeted support, and documents the evidence rather than initiating a special-education referral.
Research basis
RTI models applied to culturally and linguistically diverse students must account for cultural and linguistic factors and for adequate core instruction, or they risk misidentifying language difference as disability.
Klingner, J. K., & Edwards, P. A. (2006). Cultural considerations with response to intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.6 [link]
First-grade English language learners at risk for reading difficulty who received supplemental, evidence-based intervention in either Spanish or English met RTI standards at higher rates than peers who did not, and the gains were maintained into second grade.
Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Prater, K., & Cirino, P. T. (2006). The response to intervention of English language learners at risk for reading problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 390-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390050201 [link]
Academic and literacy proficiencies developed in one language can transfer to another through a common underlying proficiency, so home-language literacy is an asset and a basis for English literacy development.
Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3-49). Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University, Los Angeles.
When difficulties appear only in the English-only instructional context and not in the student's home language, an underlying disability is less likely; tiered supports must include adequate ESL instruction and culturally responsive teaching.
Zacarian, D. (2011). Using RTI effectively with English language learners. Colorín Colorado. https://www.colorincolorado.org/article/rti-and-english-language-learners [link]
An asset-based stance reframes instruction from what multilingual learners cannot do to what they can do, recognizing their languages, experiences, and metalinguistic awareness as resources for learning.
WIDA. (2019). The WIDA can do philosophy. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. https://wida.wisc.edu/sites/default/files/resource/WIDA-CanDo-Philosophy.pdf [link]
Beginning in 2026-2027, the Texas English Language Proficiency Standards describe five proficiency levels (Pre-Production, Beginning, Intermediate, High Intermediate, and Advanced), replacing the prior four-level system, for differentiating instruction by language proficiency.
Texas Education Agency. (2024). English language proficiency standards (ELPS) update: 2026-2027. https://www.txel.org/media/atraqi0g/elps-update-2026-2027.pdf [link]
Sources reviewed by an independent second-language-acquisition specialist and an adversarial citation audit.
Ask Verónica about RTI for Emergent Bilingual Students
Verónica is our AI tutor, and she knows this strategy. Tell her about your classroom, your mix of proficiency levels, or a specific TEKS you are planning to teach, and she will help you put RTI for Emergent Bilingual Students to work.
These strategies are part of the free ELPS Online Helper. Learn the 2026 ELPS and earn 1 hour of CPE credit.
Explore the free course